Friday, July 26, 2013

WikiLeaks turns into Political Party with Assange as Candidate

 0  2  0  0 Google +0
 +
Julian Assange formally inaugurated a political party bearing the name of his anti secrecy organization. He may not be able to leave the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, but that's not stopping him from announcing a campaign for the Senate in Australia.
Julian Assange announced seven candidates Thursday, including himself, for the Australian Senate elections this year. Assange has been stuck in the embassy for over a year now, but that hasn't been all bad for Assange as he was capable of managing the case of Edward Snowden to regain some of the spotlight that could be a boost for his senate campaign. WikiLeaks Party would field seven candidates in Victoria, New South Wales and Western Australia states. Its national council member Sam Castro said that if Assange wins a seat but cannot return to Australia by then, the party can choose a replacement. He would be required to take up his Senate seat on July 1, 2014 — if he wins.
In a telephone interview with New York Time reported July 25, he said he had every confidence in his ability to run a campaign from the Ecuadorean Embassy in London. "It's not unlike running the WikiLeaks organization. We have people on every continent. We have to deal with over a dozen legal cases at once. However, it's nice to be politically engaged in my home country," he said.
Assange said his party's seven Senate candidates would go to the national capital of Canberra to address what it says has been a gradual decline in Australian democracy over the past 30 years. "Canberra needs to be a place of light, not a place of darkness," he said. The Australian government has echoed U.S. condemnations of Assange's publishing, but has also acknowledged he has broken no Australian law.
According to the Australian website for the party: "The WikiLeaks Party stands for unswerving commitment to the core principles of civic courage nourished by understanding and truthfulness and the free flow of information. It is a party that will practice in politics what WikiLeaks has done in the field of information by standing up to the powerful and shining a light on injustice and corruption."
Julian addressed the party launch in the Victoria state capital of Melbourne via Skype from the Ecuadorean Embassy in London, where he has taken asylum from extradition to Sweden to face questioning over sexual offense allegations. He says the extradition to the Scandinavian country is merely a first step in efforts to move him to the United States, where he has infuriated officials by publishing secret documents, including 250,000 State Department cables.
Julian Assange’s decision to run for the Australian Senate was at first announced in March 2012. His intent to form a WikiLeaks Party was announced in late 2012 in which he stated that the party would be a vehicle for his candidacy for a seat in the Australian Senate in the 2013 election.


Read more: http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/355229#ixzz2aAUJVPp4

Thursday, July 25, 2013

Exhibition Review

Exhibition Review: Spectacle: 12 Presentations of Contemporary Museum Architecture in China

By Clare Jacobson
June 3, 2013

Photo © Cai Feng
View of Spectacle with “Unbuilt City” by Feng Lu and Liu Yuyang (foreground), “Future of the Museum in China” by China Megacities Lab/GSAPP Columbia University, directed by Jeffrey Johnson (rear left), “Bias” by Yu Ting (rear center), and “Museum of Unknown” by Qiu Anxiong (rear right).
Right as the quantity, quality, and scale of new museums in China are reaching an apex, Shanghai’s new Power Station of Art (PSA) is addressing this phenomenon with a well-timed exhibition, Spectacle: 12 Presentations of Contemporary Museum Architecture in China, which runs through July 18. The title comes from the curators’—Zhang Ming, Bu Bing, and Zhang Jiajing—contention that museums both present spectacles and are spectacles.

The curators approach the topic through a lens of “presentations instead of representations,” intending that the 12 projects explore not only the design of museums but also “the social, cultural, and political transformations” they produce. Presentations include installations such as “B10 Upgrade Strategy—OCATEA/HQ” by Urbanus, an activity center to encourage the making of art; “Bias” by Yu Ting, a treelike collection of convex mirrors producing a purposefully distorted view; and “Art for Lease” by Qiu Anxiong, a display of contemporary Chinese art that will be loaned out to visitors. The included projects investigate ideas of participation, perception, content, and a museum’s connection with its site.
Still, architects being architects, there are many representations in Spectacle. Zhang Ming and Zhang Zi’s “Largeness-Smallness” consists of floating cubes displaying pictures of large museums and wooden models of small ones. The work comments on the differing scale of current state-run and private museums. “Future of the Museum in China” by China Megacities Lab/GSAPP Columbia University, directed by Jeffery Johnson, presents museum floor plans on a great expanse of wallpaper, representing the “scale, formal diversity, and iconic ambition” of new museums. “Buddha and Sentient Beings” shows films of two of architect Liu Jiakun’s built works, the Luyeyuan Stone Sculpture Museum and the Hu Huishan Memorial House, to emphasize history and memory. “Unbuilt City” presents models of unrealized museum proposals, which Feng Lu and Liu Yuyang collected through postings on WeChat and Weibo. “The unbuilt is a fundamental part of the architect’s work,” says Liu. “That’s very seldom discussed in China.”
Other representations are less concrete. Yuan Feng’s “Museum of the Future” uses a holographic projection, which Yuan sees as the four- or five-dimensional hyperspace of the future. Sheng Zhonghai’s “Elevation” inserts photos of the neighborhood surrounding Shanghai’s Rockbund Art Museum (RAM) onto a construction shot of the project. Small views of the streetscape, taken before and after RAM’s opening, suggest the changes the building has wrought.
Spectacle is the first architecture exhibition at PSA. A former power station located near Shanghai’s Huangpu River, the building was repurposed during Expo 2010 Shanghai China as the Pavilion of the Future. In October 2012, it was inaugurated as the PSA, China’s first state-owned museum dedicated to contemporary art. Zhang Ming, co-curator of Spectacle, and Zhang Zi were architects-in-chief of the PSA.
Two projects in the exhibition use the PSA itself as their focus. Zhang Jiajing’s “9 Pieces” cuts a metal model of the building into nine sections. “Once a building is sliced,” Zhang claims, “it loses its arrogance.” “Museum Watching” by Bu Bing and Chai Tao is a circle of television monitors playing videos shot throughout the PSA. The work acknowledges that the act of visiting a museum has become as important as seeing its art.
Spectacle complements other recent events in Shanghai dedicated to new museums, including The Future of the Museum exhibition at the HKU/Shanghai Study Centre and "MUSEUM? The Art Museum-ification of Shanghai” symposia at the K11 Art Space. These projects share Spectacle’s intention to investigate the changes that come with museum construction. In both presenting and representing new museums in China, Spectacle succeeds in exploring not only what these new buildings look like, but also what they mean.
Clare Jacobson is a Shanghai-based design writer and author of the forthcoming book "New Museums in China".

Wednesday, July 24, 2013

AD Interviews: Juan Herreros

http://www.archdaily.com/400522/ad-interviews-juan-herreros/?utm_source=internal&utm_medium=widget&utm_name=interviews&utm_content=400522

http://vimeo.com/61653491




Juan Herreros is one of the most influential Spanish architects practicing today. Executing a delicate balance between his role defining the practice of architecture with work in the academy, he has not only overseen the construction of significant built projects, but also teaches at School of Architecture of Madrid and is a Full Professor at GSAPP Columbia University in New York. It was recently announced that his winning proposal for the Munch Museum/Deichman Library competition was given the green light. The museum will house the world’s largest collection of Edvard Munch artworks and is scheduled to open in 2018. 
Herreros strives to highlight architecture’s multi-faceted, multi-disciplinary nature by revealing the complex relationships that lie behind individual projects—undergirded by what Herreros identifies as a “technical culture” (see the exhibition Dialogue Architecture that he curated at the last Venice Biennale).
Together with Iñaki Abalos he founded Abalos&Herreros in 1984. In 1992 they founded the International Multimedia League (LMI), an organization that contributes to the simplification and intensification of artistic practice. Since 2006 he practices with the firm Herreros Arquitectos a collaborative office that has won numerous competitions and commissions. His projects can be found around the world and range from schemes for public spaces to designs for houses.
“Something unique about [our] studio is that, given the difficulties of doing research in architecture today and the usefulness of the “research applied to architecture” concept, we maintain two open, integrated lines of work: one line maintains small projects, very quick, very immediate; and the other is related to the large projects, generally the result of international competitions around the world.”
   
Check out a full transcript of our interview with Herreros after the break…
Juan Herreros: My name is Juan Herreros, architect, based in Madrid. I am the founding principal of Juan . I teach at the Polytechnic University of Madrid (UPM), a school that I’ve had a relationship with since I was 36, 37 years ago. I am also a teacher at Columbia GSAPP, and so I maintain a very close link to the academic and professional worlds, which I understand as two laboratories: one is a field of experimentation for what you want to accomplish in the other.
Herreros Arquitectos is an office with 20 people. We believe that it can be explained as a collaborative platform where people really contribute and participate in projects in a way that goes beyond the traditional hierarchy model, something that you can see in our proposal for the 2012 Venice Biennale.
Something unique about this studio is that, given the difficulties of doing research in architecture today and the usefulness of the “research applied to architecture” concept, we maintain two open, integrated lines of work: one line maintains small projects, very quick, very immediate; and the other is related to the large projects, generally the result of international competitions around the world.
ArchDaily: What is Architecture?
Juan Herreros: It is, I believe, a place where several situations, interests and desires come together, which have to do with the exploration of what it is that we want, what gives us pleasure, how we want to live. Architecture, really, can be many things, what is important is how each one lives it. In my case it is really the activity that a group of people develops so others can find the harmony between their desires and their environment.
I believe that today the role of the architect in society is to establish links between different worlds, which for historic reasons weren’t necessarily related; therefore, today, the architect has to be a tool for dialogue and an analyst during the conception of things, rather than a mere designer of buildings.
ArchDaily: What is the importance of innovation in your office?
Juan Herreros: The concept of innovation that I am interested in has to do with the progress of concepts and ideas and not with a fascination with new technologies or resources. The true innovation is the evolution of concepts; for example, to ask ourselves until what point can we simplify our complex world; until what point can we develop an architecture that reaches more people; until what point can we stick to apparently certain, immovable truths of the architecture practice that have turned into nothing and now barely have any significance?
I think that architecture must review all these concepts and free itself from the weights that have recently impeded it from moving fluidly.
ArchDaily: What is the importance of networking for your work?
Juan Herreros: I’m not very interested in concepts from the worlds of economics, philosophy or biology, probably because I have a technical background, so you could say there are things that I live with more naturally.
Networking seems to me as natural as the air we breathe, I mean, we cannot suddenly discover it, as if it were a novelty. Networking means we can utilize a place within a complex organization, an organization that’s outside us, and operate within it, giving it personality and a sense of purpose.
Networking can be understood in many ways, positive and also negative, but for me it is basically the construction of an architectural community, as it exists in the scientific community, for example, where the work of one architect can be useful for others.
ArchDaily: What is the importance of the Internet for your work?
Juan Herreros: We don’t do much beyond the usual on the Internet, but we perfectly understand that these common things are absolutely vital.
In my case, I am not as much in the office as I’d like to be, and to have simple and fluid communication is essential. But beyond this, the Internet is basically a reference archive and a place of constant confrontation between what we want to do and what other people have done. In this aspect, while not having a dependence on the Internet, we are constantly connected to certain places where we interact and maintain an open dialog, which gives our studio its personality.
ArchDaily: What would you recommend to someone who wants to study architecture?
Juan Herreros: When it comes to giving advice to an architecture student or someone who wants to study architecture, I can be exaggeratedly old-fashioned: I think that the most important thing an architecture student can have is culture – with the caveat that culture is not something that you find in books or that can be learned, but something that implies maintaining an open and interested attitude towards what is happening in the world.  I think that there is no architect who doesn’t have a directed, intentioned, willing knowledge about what happens in our present. So, I would recommend to an architecture student, and maybe not just particularly architecture, to have an education as extraordinary as possible. And, if possible, to focus it in one direction, any, but with a certain specificity: I mean, with a unique focus, a personal focus that will let you, in the future, add something concrete or new that others don’t know.
ArchDaily: From your experience, what can you tell us about running an architecture office?
Juan Herreros: Well, to direct an architecture office today is no longer to have a workshop with apprentices and masters, it is really an enterprise, with strong ties to the pragmatic world – which is, I suppose, less exciting, but I think that it’s very important that studios maintain a certain personality, a character. A way that studios can be somehow identified, that makes them unique at a certain moment. In this sense I believe that the most exciting adventure in running your studio is generating this personal identity and being able to say “well, today our office has these characteristics – or we want it to have those characteristics”. This is a very important project in itself. I think that in the future it’s going to be harder to pursue your career and run your own studio as there will be so many figures and types of studios, but the ones who will be able to survive in this highly competitive environment will be those that have a unique identity.
Cite:Basulto, David. "AD Interviews: Juan Herreros" 10 Jul 2013. ArchDaily. Accessed 24 Jul 2013. <http://www.archdaily.com/400522>